Keelan Oakley vs Milan Drinic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W W W W W L
Form
W L L W W W L W W LHead To Head: Oakley 1 - 0 Drinic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Oakley winning 2 and Drinic winning 1. The last match between Oakley and Drinic was at the Greece F3 (Heraklion), 20-03-2017, Q3, Hard with Keelan Oakley getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Keelan Oakley | 1 |
| Milan Drinic | 0 |
Greece F3 (Heraklion)(20-03-2017)
6
4
4
6
6
4
| Oakley | Stats | Drinic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 887 |
| Highest Rank | 635 | |
| 33 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 46% (76-88) | Career Total W/L | 55% (170-141) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Sonego PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Keelan Oakley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Lucas Miedler
Player
Keelan Oakley
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Milan Drinic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Christian Lerby
Player
Milan Drinic
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
40 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lambert Ruland
Player
Milan Drinic
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
84 of
119)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
14%
(
3 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Milan Drinic
Player
Filip Gustafsson
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(7) 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-6(7) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 10-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (76/88) | Win/Loss | 55% (170/141) |
| 47% (174/193) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (395/330) |
| 49% (1650/1706) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3525/3281) |
| 54% (38/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (44/39) |
| 47% (9/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (126/102) |
| 39% (19/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (10/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 157 | Aces Total | 355 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 145 | Total Double Faults | 697 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 437.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 354.36 |
| 57% (1470/2590) | 1st Serve % | 60% (6731/11311) |
| 68% (997/1470) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4238/6731) |
| 47% (521/1120) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2144/4579) |
| 38% (79/210) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (523/1176) |
| 35% (924/2611) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4678/11158) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 11% (1/8) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 49% (75/77) | Futures W/L | 55% (169/140) |
| 47% (75/159) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (164/302) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 47% (17/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (33/70) |
| 48% (20/42) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (49/106) |
| 86% (78/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (172/143) |
| 14% (78/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (172/29) |
| 9% (86/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (139/28) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
